Testimony on PR.2 Concludes in House Government Operations Committee

Chairwoman Copland-Hannzas, House Government Operations

Government Operations Committee is poised to vote on PR.2;  Declaration of rights; clarifying the prohibition on slavery and indentured servitude today. Final testimony submitted is below:

Mark Hughes
Executive Director, Justice For All
Coordinator, Vermont Racial Justice Alliance
PR.2 Testimony
House Government Operations Committee
Room 11, Vermont Statehouse
May 9, 2019 9:30

Good morning Madam Chair and House Government Operations Committee. I am Mark Hughes, Director of Justice For All and Coordinator for the Racial Justice Reform Alliance.  We are the proponents of the Proposal.

I am offering additional testimony for your consideration as you move into your committee discussion and possible vote today.    

We are in support of the amendment as passed by the Senate.  Please pass it unanimously.

2018 introduced new hope as Racial Justice Reform Coalition advanced Act 9 into law.  In it, for the first time in history was legislation creating a panel and an Executive Director to “promote racial justice reform throughout the State by mitigating systemic racism in all systems of State government…” 

Our research with Act 54, 2017 (Racial disparities), Act 9, 2018 (Racial Equity) and the Fair and Impartial Policing Policy led us to understand that state laws and institutions inherently create and sustain racial disparities. The constitutional amendment is a continuation of our work to dismantle this systemic racism. We successfully convinced the Vermont Democratic Party to adopt a platform statement to address slavery in the constitution and lobbied the legislature for a resolution, resulting in H.R.25 (2018) (not taken up in House Government Operations). Recently the League of Cities and Towns passed a resolution and the Bishop and Episcopal Diocesan Council of Vermont issued a letter of support for the Proposal.   

As indicated in the Proposal, as introduced in the Senate, PR.2 has always been about “addressing systemic racism in our state laws and institutions.”  Despite this fact, much attention in testimony has been given to words “removing all reference to slavery”.  As indicated in our original request last year, that has never been the Alliances primary goal.  The Vermont Constitution in its current state is unclear on slavery prohibition.   

To be clear, this discussion goes beyond slavery.  To constitutionalize slavery (or form of servitude) because a person is “bound by the law for the payment of debts, damages, fines, costs, or the like” is tantamount to criminalization of poverty which always has a greater impact on black people.  Clearly repercussions on criminalization manifest in all aspects of life and impact our posterity.  Clarification of Article I of the constitution enables us to take a major step in the right direction in addressing systemic racism in Vermont.  This amendment will serve to nullify any statute supported by this clause and call into question any institution created to sustain the premise of it into perpetuity. 

Though the Senate’s decision to remove “addressing systemic racism in our state laws and institutions” in the “Purpose” section of the Proposal has created some confusion surrounding our intent, the current proposed language satisfies our objective of providing clarification on slavery prohibition.

Many have asked why this is important. This is about our racist national and State history of criminalization and disproportionate incarceration of black (and poor) people. It expands in concentric circles beyond this, adversely impacting African American’s fair and equal access to housing, education, health services, employment and economic development. 

You have heard testimony that the US constitution makes the language of slavery in our constitution “academic” and it suggests that it has “no practical consequence”. But we have come to know that the 13th amendment constitutionalized slavery for the punishment of a crime, when duly convicted. Vermont State laws permit  “Imprisonment In Lieu Of Payment of Fines And Costs”.  Article I of the Vermont constitution provides an exception that permits slavery when “bound by law for the payment of debts, damages, fines, costs, or the like”.  Collectively, this is the literal criminalization of poverty, the new slavery!

In closing, our work on addressing systemic racism has been ongoing for nearly five years.  Our analysis of the necessity to address the constitution is rooted in data driven research.  Those challenges, which are systemic in Vermont, must be addressed at the root – the constitution.

Please pass PR.2 unanimously.

Thank you for your service

Public Hearing PR.2; Constitutional Amendment Prohibiting Slavery


Yesterday morning we found out that the House Committee on Government Operations was planning on holding a Public Hearing TONIGHT on PR.2;  a Proposal to amend the Constitution, to clarify that slavery and indentured servitude in any form are prohibited.  We requested the Hearing be moved to enable us the ability to effectively notify our constituents. The House leadership’s responded with a narrative of time constraints, citing the approaching end of session.  We informed the Committee that ” [as per]… § 72 of the Constitution and House Rule51a, the Senate and House have the entire biennium to complete their respective votes…”.  As a result, the Public Hearing date has been changed to May 8th!  You can find out more about the Public Hearing here.  Please come to the Public Hearing.

  • If you need accommodations for the Public Hearing, please call 828.2228
  • If you’d like to provide written testimony, you can send it to testimony@leg.state.vt.us.
  • If you want more details on the Proposal or the Public Hearing, please call the assistant at (802) 828-2267 or email: kobrien@leg.state.vt.us

Let’s do all we can to ensure a turnout at this historic Public Hearing for the constitutional amendment that clarifies that slavery and indentured servitude of any type are prohibited. Some would have us believe that this is largely symbolic.  There could be nothing further form the truth.  Slavery is at the root of the criminalization, punishment and oppression of black and poor people. Our constitution reflects our values and underpins our laws and institutions. Please show up and stand with us in solidarity.

Can you help us with the work that we are doing?  Your small donation has an immediate impact on this vitally important work.  Supported the work of Justice For All and The Vermont Racial Justice Alliance because of the proven results that we consistently deliver.  We have experts behind the scene all year long doing the work that affects YOU!  Provide a quick, secure contribution here.

  Click HERE to Donate 

Thank you!

Unprecedented Public Hearings; Vermont Constitutional Amendment Completely Prohibiting Slavery

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is slide1-5.jpg


This has never happened in Vermont.

Show up and be a part of history!

Thursday, April 4th at 5:00 pm, there will be a public hearing on a proposal (PR.2) to amend the Constitution of the State of Vermont to completely prohibit slavery (as introduced)which will “serve as a foundation for addressing systemic racism in our States’s laws and institutions”.  Testimony till now has been taken in the committee room during normal business hours.  We believe that this has resulted in the current version of the proposal where that purpose is now “to clarify that slavery in any form is prohibited” and offers confusing and unnecessary language that could be interpreted to the contrary.

What are we asking of the committee that they are not doing?

  • Take testimony at a time when working Vermont can be heard
  • Ensure that the constitution clearly and unambiguously prohibits slavery   
  • Replace language referring to “Qualifications of Freemen and Freewomen” in Vermont Constitution Chapter II
  • Comport the language to our current ideals and values, not our history; not our current laws and institutions

If you are interested in testifying on Thursday here is how you can reach the committee and inform them of your desire to do so (you can also offer written testimony):

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is slide02.jpg
Slavery is still not completely abolished in Vermont

Here are the instructions for preparing testimony.

Do you need a ride?  Get on this list ASAP and we’ll help you make it to this event.Paragraph

The criminalization, punishment and oppression of black and poor people is at the root of slavery. Show up and be a part of history in our journey to dismantle the foundation of systemic racism in Vermont.  It has taken us 242 years to get to here.  Please make sure that you are in room 11 in the Statehouse on Thursday, April 4th, 2019 at 5:00 pm. 


Testify to Prohibit Slavery Constitutionally; Change Vermont

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is slide1-3.jpg


The Senate Government Operations Committee has delayed the vote on the constitutional amendment, prohibiting slavery.  Testimony has been reopened for Thursday, February 28th at 3:15.    

1)  TESTIFY ON PR.2:  Give the Senate Government Operations Committee the Rest of the Story

We”re excited that this will give us an opportunity to tell our stories.  The Senate Government Operations Committee have concerned themselves with the task of preserving the historical significance of the fact that “Vermont was the first state to abolish slavery”.  The fact is that Vermont never abolished slavery from the constitution of 1777 or 1786 and after becoming a state the constitution of 1793 never abolished slavery.  In fact, after 242 years and 28 adopted amendments the Vermont constitution has yet to abolish slavery.  Sadly, the language that the Government Operations Committee was poised to vote on would not have abolished slavery either.  To be clear, no state in US history has held constitutional language permitting slavery longer than Vermont. 

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is slide1-5.jpg

Why is this important?  It is language like this in the constitution that serves as the edifice of the criminalization, punishment and oppression of black and poor people. This is not the time to attempt to “preserve” aspects of this document to capture the essence of the mindset of white men at a time when black people were property.  This is not even a time to comport the new language to the statutes, rules and institutions that it now upholds.  The purpose of this proposal (PR.2) is “…to serve as a foundation for addressing systemic racism in our State’s laws and institutions. You can help change this entire system by helping to shake it at its foundation.  #EndslaveryVT


2)  Ask Senate Government Operations to Take up S.120: Give the Racial Equity Director a Chance to Succeed! 

Remember S.281, the Systemic Racism Mitigation Commission?  Well the Racial Equity Director was left reporting the Governor with an option to move the position under the Secretary of Administration.  We all know how this story ends. If there is any hope for the Racial Equity Director to be effective, me must ensure that the position is on par with his or her contemporaries.  Join us in our calls for Senate Government Operations to TAKE UP S.120.


3)  Ask Senate Judiciary to Take up S.119:  Address Use of Force with Law Enforcement

Did you know that law enforcement does not collect use of force data as a part of the race traffic stop data collection processes?  It gets worse, There is no model Appropriate Use of Force Policy or standardized training across all agencies either.  A recent report from the Burlington Police Department indicated that use of force was being applied to black people at 4 to 5 times the rate as white folks.  Stand with us as we call for Senate Judiciary to TAKE UP S.119.  #fixUseofForceVT


  • Leave a message for your senator.  Find your senator here OR call 828.2228
  • Email the Committee and senior leadership.  Email address: vermont-senate-judiciary@googlegroups.com
  • Leave a message with member of Senate Government Operations.  Find member here or call 828.2278

4)  Ask House Government Operations to Take up H.478: Appoint a Slavery Reparations Commission 

Legislators have acknowledged disparities in the criminal justice system in Act 54 (2017) and the Attorney General’s and HRC’s Task Force Report.  The need to address systemic racism in all state government is in the process of being addressed with the hiring of a Racial Equity position, as prescribed in Act 9 (2018).  Serious consideration must be given to if and how Vermont chooses to address reparations.  This commission will grapple with these questions.  Help us as we call on House Government Operations to TAKE UP H.478.  #ReparationsVT


  • Leave a message for your Representative.  Find your representative here OR call 828.2228
  • Email the Committee and senior leadership.  Email address: vermont-house-government-operations@googlegroups.com
  • Leave a message with member of House Government Operations.  Find member here or call 828.2267

5) Ask the House Judiciary to take up H.465: Expand the Human Rights Commission and Prohibit Racial Profilingiciary

The Human Rights Commission has never in its existence been more busy and it has always been underfunded. What is more important than protecting the civil liberties of every protected category in this state? We have waited far too long. Let House Judiciary know that it’s time to TAKE UP H.465. #NoracialprofilingVT


  • Document
  • Block

Status & Visibility

VisibilityPublicPublishFeb 27, 2019 7:34 amPost FormatAsideGalleryLinkImageQuoteStandardStatusVideoAudioChatStick to the Front PageAuthorerinarose802hughesmanthonygmailcomvermontinterfaithactionMove to trash




Featured Image



What Equity Looks Like and Ending Slavery in Vermont

What Equity Looks Like
24 February, 2019
3:00 – 5:00 pm
First Congregational Church
38 South Winooski Avenue

Here is an opportunity for us to celebrate the work we have accomplished and discuss the unprecedented year ahead.  There will be an overview and discussion on racial equity; a presentation on current implementation of Act 54 (2017) and Act 9 (2018) and an opportunity to discuss the racial equity bills that are being introduced. The sponsoring legislators will be on hand for the discussion. 

Come out and get involved
Family friendly

#EndslaveryVTThe proposal to amend to the constitution; eliminating slavery (Proposal 2) was taken up in Senate Government Operations Committee last month and testimony has been ongoing.  There is mounting discussion about the prospect of leaving the language of constitutionalized slavery in the Vermont constitution for “historical purposes”.  Further, the limited number of folks asking to testify has caused the Proposal to get stuck in Committee.  This is the first time in 242 years that we have had an opportunity to remove this language.  Help us make it happen.   Contact the Senate Government Operations Committee and tell them to “remove slavery from the constitution”.  Let them know that you are willing to testify!  

Here are three ways you can voice support or sign up to testify:

  1. Email Senate Gov Ops at this address: vermont-senate-government-operations@googlegroups.com
  2. Leave a message at 828.2228
  3. Call the Committee Assistant at 828.2272

NO Taxation and Regulation Without Reparations Campaign

The legislature has the regulation of cannabis on the fast track.  The financial upside seems to have given everyone “war on drugs” amnesia. Regulating Cannabis without taking these factors into consideration is scandalous and immoral.  Stand with us as we proclaim No taxation and Regulation Without Reparations!  

  • Automatic, no cost expungement of cannabis related criminal records
  • Immediate release of those incarcerated for cannabis related crimes;
  • Exclusion of cannabis related crimes as impediments to opportunities for employment and access to public services;
  • Training and start-up assistance in the hemp and cannabis industry;

Join us as we address this vitally important issue.  Here is how you can help:


Justice For All pursues racial justice within Vermont’s criminal justice system through advocacy, education, and relationship-building.   Would you like to Become a member? 

Here is an option for a one-time contribution

Protect Me

Mark Hughes, Executive Director, Justice For All

The Advice Show, on Kiah Morris

I am deeply disappointed with the manner in which the Attorney General has addressed Kiah Morris’ request for an investigation. V.S.A. 13, 1023 is simple assault.  This and potentially aggravated stalking clearly are crimes committed in this case.  13 V.S.A, 1458 provides injunctive reliefs despite any charges being brought against the “alleged” perpetrator.  Instead of prosecuting this case, the Attorney General defended and judged it!   The resulting new “Bias Incident Reporting Protocol” is deeply problematic. There was no community stakeholders’ coordination in this process. This is indicated by there being no civilian reporting process.  I guess they never thought about the potential of a “bias incident” being committed by law enforcement.  The protocol internalizes all processes to law enforcement.  The person filing the claim has no visibility or involvement in critical referral (HRC, OCR, ACLU, etc…) decisions. Finally, who collects the data?

It’s so sad that Kiah, James and Jamal would be traumatized yet again and let down by the system on the same day.  Sadder is that it was all too predictable.  There never seems to be a problem figuring out how to protect white folks (alleged perpetrator or victim) and their property throughout all history.  There has never seemed to be a problem finding a law that could be applied to prosecuting black folks.  In cases where there hasn’t been a law to prosecute black people, we have been a nation that simply created them.  All this as white people nervously exclaim “all lives matter” when we try to remind them that black lives matter.

I know that many are wondering where we go from here. First, T.J., apply and prosecute the law in this case and change law if necessary to address future occurrences (13V.S.A. 1454 & 1458 and 9 V.S.A 4501-4507).  Secondly, Pro Tempe Ashe, Speaker Johnson, Chairwoman White and Chairwoman Copeland-Hanzas, get a handle on civilian oversight of law enforcement by starting with public hearings on civilian oversight of law enforcement in this state (FIPP included)!  Third, Chairman Sears and Chairwoman Grad, join them and conduct public hearings on the implementation progress on the only laws designed to address systemic racism, Act 54 (2017), Racial Disparities in the Criminal and Juvenile Justice System Advisory Panel and Act 9 (2018), Racial Equity in State Government. Finally, Speaker Johnson and Pro Tempe Ashe, embrace fairness, equity and diversity in Outcome Indicators in the legislature and lead by prioritizing and championing legislation to meet these objectives.   The work required here is the same as the work required addressing all racism in this nation and the good news is that Vermont has already started.

There was a Vermont Democratic Party gathering at the Hilton Hotel in Burlington on November 9th, 2016.  Word came in on the results of the presidential election and T.J., you looked me in the eyes and said “Don’t worry Mark.  I’ll protect you”.  Well, Mr. Attorney General, here we are and I need you to be true to your word.  Protect me.


Analysis: Incarceration Rate of People Of Color Report

The Vermont legislature passed Act 164 (2018) an act relating to bail reform. Section 6 of this law directed an “Incarceration Rates of People of Color Study”. The Vermont legislature passed Act 164 (2018) an act relating to bail reform. Section 6 of this law directed an “Incarceration Rates of People of Color Study”. What follows is a critical analysis of that report.


(a) Study Committee. The Commissioner of the Department of
Corrections, the Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety, the
Attorney General, the Executive Director of the Department of State’s
Attorneys and Sheriffs, and the Director of the Vermont State Police shall meet during the 2018 legislative interim to examine data regarding people of color who are incarcerated in Vermont. To the extent possible, the Committee shall also review data regarding people of color incarcerated in Maine and New Hampshire.

(b) On or before October 15, 2018, the committee shall report to the Joint
Legislative Justice Oversight Committee on:
(1) data regarding all nonwhite offenders in the custody of the
Department of Corrections, including:
(A) demographic information about the offender, including race and
ethnicity and all known places of residence;
(B) the crime or crimes for which the offender is serving a sentence
or being detained; and
(C) the length of the sentence being served by the offender or the
length of his or her detainment;
(2) sentence length comparison data between white and nonwhite
offenders who committed the same offense; and
(3) comparison data among Vermont, Maine, and New Hampshire
regarding sentence lengths and incarceration rates of people of color.

Analysis of the Vermont Department of Corrections Report Requested by the Legislature in Act 164 (2018), Section 6
1.  The report request was to examine data regarding “non-white offenders “in custody”.  The report expanded the scope to all which “were” incarcerated in 2017, hence providing misleading demographic information suggesting progress of a reduction of 11% African American incarceration to that of 8.5%. 
2.  The Executive Summary of the Report states that the commissioning authority is ACT 163 (2018).  It is actually ACT 164.

3.  The report is cited as a “preliminary report” but no follow-on intent is communicated.

4.  ACT 164 calls for race, ethnicity of offenders.  The report moves beyond the scope of this request to include gender and age, while failing to provide all data requested.

5.  The report acknowledges a “flawed” data collection process in DOC.
6.  A poorly explained Analytical algorithm referred to as “Chi Square Goodness Fit Tests” are used to arrive at the conclusion that the proportion of incarcerated blacks were under the so called “hypothesized” rates in at least one instance. 

7.  DOC reported not having sentencing length data for 2017.
8.  Additional unknown and poorly explained analytical algorithms referred to as the “Chi Square Test of Independence”, “Independent Sample T-Test”, “One-way Analysis Variance ”were used to arrive at the detrimental conclusions that there are significant differences in:
a.  frequency of charges issued to white and black inmates.
b.  frequency of drug charges issued to white and black inmates.
c.  sentence length between white and black inmates.         
d.  sentence length across six race categories.
e.  frequency of Disciplinary Reports issued to white and black inmates.

9.  Interstate comparison data is confusing and inconclusive.

ACT 134 (2012) requested similar data. The report, delivered in 2015 included unsubstantiated assertions and was largely inconclusive due to unavailability of data.

This report also fails to provide the substantiating data to support the conclusions.  The black-box algorithms discussed in items (6) and (8) are analogous to “not showing ones work” to some very serious problems.  Also troubling is the fact that (unlike previous reporting) the data set includes all personnel that entered the system in 2017.  This fails to take into account that 80% of inmates are incarcerated for periods of longer duration and at any given day black people make up about 11% (not 8.5%) of the prison population.

Finally, the development of this report was absent vital stakeholders throughout the process.  Community members (specifically people of color) should have been involved.  This could have been easily accomplished by simply routing this request to the Racial Disparities in the Criminal and Juvenile Justice System Advisor Panel.

Mark Hughes, ED, Justice For All

Mark Hughes,
Executive Director
Justice For All

The Battle Against the War on Drugs

Our Justices courageously interpreted the constitution with a blind eye towards justice.  They chose right over easy.

The Battle Against the War on Drugs

The Vermont Supreme Court issued a monumental decision of seismic proportion a couple weeks ago in Zullo vs. the State of Vermont. As legal scholars grapple with the ramifications of Article 11, monetary damages and search and seizure, the Attorney General is still muddling through this voluminous decision.  The decision rambles on about reasonable suspicion resulting in the smell of “a faint odor of burnt marijuana”, the idea of Article 11 being “self executing” (enabling Gregory to file suite against the state), “bad faith” and “unlawful animus”.  The one that thing can be said of this historic decision is that it is complicated and even befuddling legal experts. With all this to unpack it is probably fair to say that this State decision is comparable to Brown vs. the Board of Education at a national level.

This finding taught us that search and seizure protection in Vermont is greater than those offered by the US Constitution. Our Justices courageously interpreted the constitution with a blind eye towards justice.  They chose right over easy.  Interestingly what lies at the center of this case is a black man, drugs (suspicion) and a law enforcement officer.  This case started with yet another traffic stop, and though seemingly absent use of force, the force exerted caused traumatic impact. Gregory was one of the fortunate few.  He was able to negotiate the maze of confusion and find remedy. Make no mistake about it; there is nothing normal or trivial about his endeavor.  It was a miracle, thanks to the Vermont ACLU a private law firm and a number of friends of the court through an amicus brief.  

Thousands of cases never see the inside of a courtroom. Black and brown people in Vermont faced with lost civil liberties are often left traumatized and paralyzed. Now is the time for the legislature to take action.  The legislature should take up the bill expanding the Human Rights Commission with the addition of a litigator, a community outreach director and funding to enable Community Justice Center intake.  This bill calls for Vermont to join the 30 states that have made racial profiling illegal. The legislature must also conduct public hearings to determine the progress of the implementation of the work that has been accomplished in Act 9 (2018), Racial Equity Panel (and Director) and Act 54 (2017), Racal Disparities In the Criminal and Juvenile Justice System Advisory Panel. 

Finally, when discussions on regulation and legalization of marijuana arise (as is inevitable), hopefully we won’t forget the story of the black man, law enforcement officer and drugs.  There should be no regulation or taxation of marijuana without addressing the harm of the past and providing a hope for the future for black and brown people.  The moral arc of the universe is indeed long and bends toward justice in Vermont.  Let the battle against the war on drugs continue in the Green Mountain State.

Alliance Announces Legislative Agenda: #Change Vermont

Change Vermont


Contact: Mark Hughes, Justice For All Executive Director: 802.532.3030

Racial Justice Reform Coalition Changes Name, Calls for Change

Montpelier, Vermont, January 8, 2018 – The Vermont Racial Justice Alliance (the Alliance) previously the Racial Justice Reform Coalition, that advanced Act 54 (2017), Racial Disparities in the Criminal and Juvenile Justice System Advisory Panel and Act 9 (2018), Racial Equity Panel (and Director), today announced its legislative agenda, “Change Vermont:. The agenda puts forward bills abolishing constitutionalized slavery and establishing a commission to provide recommendations on reconciliation.

“We should not excuse ourselves from our responsibility for this fight. It’s time for us to recognize that racism is both a tool of oppression to harm people of color and the most historically successful instrument of oppressing and obstructing the progress of money poor white folk” said Netdahe Stoddard, a white member of the Alliance. The Alliance is moving forward bills to expand the Human Rights Commission, implement ethnic studies standards, prohibit racial profiling, roll out consistent standards for law enforcement use of force and to update Act 9. Nico Amador of Vermont ACLU said, “People of color have taken the leadership in advancing new approaches to addressing racial justice issues across the state of Vermont. It is our hope that constituents support the leadership”

Alliance members will be at the “Advancing the People’s Platform in Vermont” forum on Wednesday, January 9, 2019 from 10:45 until noon discussing the platform.

About Justice For All
Justice for All pursues racial justice within Vermont’s criminal justice system through advocacy, education, and relationship building.


Statements of Policy, Guidance for nondiscriminatory School Discipline, Withdrawn

While we weren’t looking

On December 21st 2018, the Acting US Attorney General withdrew[1] the Dear Colleague Letter on Nondiscriminatory Administration of School Discipline[2], the Overview of the Supportive School Discipline Initiative[3] and supporting documents.  Collectively these documents have served as the backbone of a framework implemented to address the administration of nondiscriminatory discipline in schools and stop the school to prison pipeline.  These statements of policy and guidance were implemented by the previous administration because of the absence of any other suitable tool as a result of an obstructionist congress, unwilling to pass the appropriate laws.

The decision to withdraw this guidance was hidden in the noise of the Friday afternoon of the most tumultuous week of this presidency.  It is being sold to us in the false narrative that the previous guidance impinged upon schools discretion in discipline and that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is an adequate remedy for discriminatory discipline in schools.  Neither is true.  Removing this guidance is a heinous atrocity, which will cause traumatic and irreparable damage to our children and our nation.

The Struggle Home

We, in Vermont have struggled tirelessly to address discriminatory discipline, harassment and bullying in our schools.  The Vermont Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil rights reported discovering in 1997 racial harassment “pervasive … [and] not a priority among school administrators, school boards, elected officials…”[4] An update, six years later reported “problems cited in its 1999 Report persist…”[5] and a recent 2015, Vermont Legal Aid reported that “Black/African-American and Native American Students Were Two to Three Times More Likely than White Students to be Suspended.”[6]   

We ask the legislature, the Attorney General and the Human Rights Commission in consultation with the Department of Children and Families and the Secretary of Education to immediately develop and implement policy that will ensure inclusiveness in standards, fairness in discipline and diversity in admissions. Address this with the urgency and commitment you showed in response to the immigration crisis in 2017.  Do this because it is the right thing to do.


Amanda Garces
Founder, Vermont Coalition for Ethnic and Social Equity in Schools

Christine Kemp-Longmore
Co-founder Community Council Accountable with Law Enforcement Officials

Wafic Faour
Vermonters For Justice in Palestine,

Mark Hughes
Executive Director, Justice For All

Tabitha Pohl-Moore President,
Rutland Area Branch of the NAACP

Steffen Glenn Gillom
President, Windham County Branch of the NAACP

Kiah Morris
Former State Representative

Sha’an Mouliert
Co-Coordinator, I am Vermont Too

Don Stevens
Chief of the Nulhegan Abenaki Tribe

Gemma Seymour,
Vermont Human Rights Advocate

[1] https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201812.pdf

[2] https://www2.ed.gov/print/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201401-title-vi.html#

[3] https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/school-discipline/appendix-3-overview.pdf

[4] http://justiceforallvt.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Public-School-Racial-Profiling-Vermont.pdf

[5] http://justiceforallvt.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Racial-Harassment-in-Vermont-Public-Schools-Progress-Report.pdf

[6] http://justiceforallvt.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Kicked-Out-VTLegal-Aid.pdf